February 1976 - Bulletin 780 (technical)
F.M. Peacock, M. Koger W.G. Kirk, E.M. Hodges, and J.R. Crockett
Mr. Peacock is Associate Animal Husbandman, ARC, Ona; Dr. Koger is Animal Geneticist,
University of Florida, Gainesville; Dr. Kirk is Animal Scientist, Emeritus, Dr. Hodges is
Agronomist, ARC, Ona; and Dr. Crockett is Associate Animal Geneticist, AREC, Belle Glade.
| INTRODUCTION | MATERIALS AND METHODS | Breed Groups | Pasture-Management Programs | Programs 1, 2, & 3 | General Management | Data Analyses | RESULTS AND DISCUSSION | Pregnancy Rate | Calf Survival | Weaning Rate | Age of Calf at Weaning | Condition Score | Wean Weight and 205-day Weight | Annual Production Per Cow | SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | LITERATURE CITED |
Beef production is the result of a combination of both genetic and environmental factors. Genetic
factors may be masked by induced or natural environmental influences which hinder expression of
hereditary traits. Environmental influences either complement or limit the genetic potential of the
animal. Thus, it is important to assess the productivity of various breed groups in alternative
production systems in order to develop the most efficient production programs. Limited information
is available on the comparative productive behavior of Brahman, European origin and crossbred cattle
under variable environmental conditions.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Brahman, Shorthorn and crossbred
cattle involving those two breeds on three pasture-management programs in the semi-tropical
environment of south central Florida.
The study was designed to evaluate the comparative production of Brahman, Shorthorn, and various
crosses of these two breeds when maintained on native, or a combination of native, and all-improved
pasture. The design of the trial is shown in Table 1
| Phase 1, 1957 to 1961 | Phase 2, 1962 to 1966 | |||||||
| Breed | Pasture program | Breed | Pasture program | |||||
| Breed of cow | of sire | 1 | 2 | 3 | of sire | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Matings per year | Matings per year | |||||||
| Brahman (B) | B | 10 | 10 | 10 | S | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| ¾ B ¼ S (B3) | B | 10 | 10 | 10 | S | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| ½ B ½ S (F1) | B | 10 | 10 | 10 | S | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| ½ B ½ S (F1) | S | 10 | 10 | 10 | B | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| ¼ B ¾ S (B1) | S | 10 | 10 | 10 | B | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Shorthorn (S) | S | 10 | 10 | 10 | B | 10 | 10 | 10 |
The herds on each of the forage programs included approximately 60 cows. Each herd included
five breed groups as follows: ten Brahman (B), ten 3/4 Brahman-1/4 Shorthorn (B3S
1), twenty
Brahman-Shorthorn first crosses (F1), ten 3/4 Shorthorn-1/4 Brahman (S3
B1) and ten Shorthorn
(S). The trial was conducted in two 5-year phases. During the first phase the B, the B3
S1, and
one-half of the F1 cows were mated to Brahman bulls while the remaining groups were mated to
Shorthorn bulls. This procedure resulted in a balanced design considering breed of calf but
resulted in confounding of breed of bull with breed of cow since only one-half of the possible
breed combinations were included during one phase. The procedure was dictated, however, by the
availability of replacement females for the study and the decision to maintain 10 animals per breed
group x year sub-cell rather than five, which would have resulted had breed of cow and breed of
sire been used annually in all possible combinations. During the second phase, breed of sire for the
different cow groups was reversed from that of the first phase. Thus, including both phases each
breed of cow was mated to bulls of both breeds. By including two mating groups (30 F1
cows
mated each to B and S bulls) across all years it was possible to remove year effects and obtain a
satisfactory comparison of all breed combinations.
Pasture-Management Programs -
Program 1 - This program involved native grasses, mainly Aristida and Andropogon spp. (wiregrass
and broomsedge) During the first 5-year period, the 60 cows and their calves grazed 812 acres of
native range divided into five fields. Eighty acres of each of these five fields were burned on alternate
years. A reduction to 772 acres in the program was made during the second phase.
Supplemental feed was provided on native range only to the extent necessary to prevent extreme
weight loss in the cows. Cows were supplemented during the winter months with 41% cottonseed
pellets and a limited amount of hay in the first phase. In phase 2 an average of 555 pounds of hay, 52
pounds cottonseed meal (41%), and 52 pounds of citrus meal were fed over a period averaging 109
days annually beginning in December.
Program 2 - This program included a combination of 73 acres of improved pasture plus 315 acres of
native grasses for the 60 cow herd. The improved pasture included 40 acres of Pensacola bahiagrass
(Paspalum notatum Flugge.) 15 acres of Coastal bermudagrass (Cynodon daclylon (L.) Pers.) and
18 acres of Pangola digitgrass (Digitaria decumbens Stent. ) during the first phase. For the second
phase the bermudagrass was replaced by digitgrass. Approximately 20 acres of the bahiagrass was
grown in conjunction with Hairy Indigo (Indigof era hirsuta Linn.) with the remaining 20 acres being
in combination with non-irrigated white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and Hubam sweetclover
(Melilotus alba Desv.). The cattle had access to the native grasses continuously and generally to one
field of improved pasture.
The annual fertilizer program per acre for improved grass pastures was approximately 400 pounds
of 8-8-8 (N-P2O5-K2O) plus 150 pounds of ammonium nitrate (33.3% N) for pangolagrass, or a like
amount of complete fertilizer plus 100 pounds of ammonium nitrate for bahiagrass pastures. The
legume pastures received 250 pounds per acre of 0-8-24 fertilizer annually with an extra application
of muriate of potash averaging 32 pounds K2O per acre on the white clover.
Cattle were given suplemental feed only in the winter of 1957-58 during phase 1. During the last
5-year period the cattle on Program 2 received supplemental feed (43 pounds hay, 65 pounds
cottonseed meal and 31 pounds citrus meal per cow) for an average of 72 days annually from January
to April.
Program 3 - This program included only improved pastures. During the first phase it included 76
acres of pangolagrass, 20 acres of which were irrigated and over-planted with white clover. Due to
pasture becoming less productive the area was increased to 107 acres for the second phase. This
change resulted in 70 acres of all pangola digitgrass, 27 acres of digitgrass overplanted with white
clover, and 10 acres of bahiagrass. Pasture fertilization in Program 3 followed the same pattern as
described for Program 2.
Cattle in Program 3 were maintained in a high nutritional status at all times. For the most part, the
cattle maintained good weights from pasture, as only an average of 280 pounds of hay per cow was
fed for each of the five winters.
General Management -
The cattle on all programs were bred in a restricted season of 105 days extending from March 15 to
July 1. All the calves were weaned at one time in early September.
Replacement heifers were grown together from weaning until being placed in their respective herds
just prior to the breeding season at two years of age.
Cows were culled on the basis of repeated reproductive failure or failure to raise a calf.
Data Analyses -
Individual performance data were recorded annually for pregnancy status, calf survival, weaning rate,
age of calf at weaning, weaning weight, 205-day weight, and market grade of calf. The research was
conducted in two phases, five years each. The separate analyses for both reproduction and production
traits are discussed.
The observed data for pregnancy status, calf survival, and weaning rate were recorded as 1 or 0
(zero). These individual data were processed initially in separate analyses for each phase. Least
squares techniques as outlined by Harvey (4) were followed, employing the same model for all
analyses. All effects were assumed to be fixed. Since subclass numbers were approximately
proportional the above analyses yielded efficient estimates of effects.
A third analysis was performed by pooling data for the two phases. The least squares means for the
breed x pasture program subclasses from the above analyses were adjusted for differences between
phase and combined in a singled analysis. The adjustments required were small for pregnancy and
weaning rates and nil for calf survival. The adjustment for combining the two phases into a single
analysis was made on the basis of differences between phases for the two breed groups of F1 cows
which were included during both periods of the study. These breed groups represented a total of
approximately 300 matings per phase. There were no indications of interactions between the two
phases. Thus, it was concluded that the combined analyses yielded unbiased estimates of effects. The
error mean square used in testing significance was the pooled error term for the two phases coded
by the harmonic mean of subclass numbers. The model for the combined analyses for reproduction
traits included breed of dam (D), breed of sire (S), pasture program (P) and their interactions (Table
2).
| Table 2. Means Squares from Analysis of Breed x Pasture Program Subclass Means of Adjusted Record. | ||||
| Source | d.f. | Pregnancy Rate | Weaning Rate | Survival Rate |
| Breed of dam (D) | 4 | 226.97** | 247.16** | 17.70 |
| Breed of sire (S) | 1 | 144.00* | 1.78 | 128.50** |
| Pasture program (P) | 2 | 896.70** | 751.03** | 12.15 |
| D x S | 4 | 42.00 | 69.58 | 9.57 |
| D x P | 8 | 97.26* | 93.51* | 4.26 |
| S x P | 2 | 33.59 | 17.86 | 5.40 |
| D x S x P | 8 | 45.67 | 56.18 | 8.63 |
| Error | ||||
| Pregnancy and wean | 1632 | 40.02 | 43.07 | - |
| Survival | 1188 | - | - | 10.32 |
| * Significantly different at P (.05). | ||||
| ** Significantly different at P (.01). | ||||
The individuals records for age of calf, condition score, 205 day weight, and weaning weight were
first analysed separately for the two phases, employing a model including year, mating groups (sire
x dam), pasture program, sex, age of dam, and first order interactions. Secondly, the data from the
two groups of F1 cows which were included across both phases of the trial were analyzed employing
a similar model. On the basis of these preliminary analyses records were adjusted for year, age of
dam, and sex on a within-program basis. The adjusted data then were analyzed by least squares
methods outlined by Harvey (4). The models utilized are indicated in Table 3.
| Table 3. Mean Squares from Analyses of Adjusted Records. | ||||||
| Source | d.f. | Weaning Age | Condition Score | 205-day Weight | Weaning Weight | Annual Prod/Cow |
| Pasture Program (P) | 2 | 6,277** | 588.1** | 930,084** | 1,398,182** | 45,610** |
| Breed of Dam (D) | 4 | 6,101** | 44.8** | 377,104** | 402,613** | 15,100** |
| Breed of sire (S) | 1 | 274 | 42.1** | 88,665** | 81,920** | 1,015 |
| P x D | 8 | 897 | 35.9** | 14,987** | 15,902** | 2,165 |
| P x S | 2 | 2,514** | 3.4 | 4,496 | 5,060 | 1,200 |
| D x S | 4 | 1,651 | 1.7 | 158,247** | 263,831** | 5,500 |
| P x D x S | 8 | 3,430** | 17.4** | 3,306 | 11,324** | 890 |
| Remainder | 1209a | 804 | 1.5 | 2,202 | 4,096 | 1,513 |
| a Error df for production per cow was 120. | ||||||
Individual records of calves weaned were analyzed for all traits other than annual production per cow.
In order to obtain observations that approached normal distribution more closely than a combination
of individual zero and weight records, annual production per cow was computed for 150 year x
program x breed-of-calf subgroups. This yielded five observations in each of the 30 breed of calf x
program groups. Analyses of these observations yielded lower standard errors of estimates than
analysis of combined individual zero and weight records.
The results from the combined analyses for both reproduction and productive traits are given in
Tables 2 and 3. Least squares means for reproduction are presented in Table 4 and for production
traits in Tables 5 and 6. Observed heterosis levels (percent advantage of crossbreeds over the mean
of the two purebred breeds) are shown by pasture program in Tables 5 and 6.
Pregnancy Rate -
Pregnancy rate was significantly influenced by both pasture program and breed of cow as well as their
interaction. The average pregnancy rates were 64%, 76%, and 81% for the native, combination, and
improved programs, respectively. The rates of improvement ranked in the anticipated order. The
performance on the improved area was somewhat lower than that reported by Gonzalez-Padilla et
al. (3) and Crockett et al. (2) for south Florida. It is explained for the most part by the relatively low
response of the purebred cows (Brahman or Shorthorn) to the improved pasture programs (Table 4).
The overall averages for the five breed groups of cows were: Brahman, 71%; 3/4 Brahman, 80%; F1,
76%; l/4, Brahman, 75%; and Shorthorn, 64%. The observation that F1 and backcross cows did not
differ significantly was noted also by Koger et al. (7) in a previous publication from the same station.
The significant (P<.05) breed of cow x pasture interaction provides an example of one form of
geneotype-environment interaction. This arose principally due to differential response to improved
pasture programs. The Brahman and Shorthorn cows had an average pregnancy rate of 61% on native
range versus 72% on the highly improved program for a difference of 11%. For crossbred cows the
averages were 67% and 86% for the same two programs for an increase of 19%.
The effect of breed of sire on pregnancy rate was significant (P<.05), 76% for the Brahman and 72%
for the Shorthorn with no significant breed of sire x pasture-program interaction.
Calf Survival -
Calf survival from birth to weaning is an important factor affecting net productivity. The combined analysis for reproduction shows survival rate to be affected by breed of sire. Calves sired by Brahman bulls had an average survival rate of 94% while the survival rate of Shorthorn sired calves was 98%.
The average death loss of 4% observed in this study is lower than that reported from other studies
in Florida (2,6).
Weaning Rate -
Weaning rate is the product of pregnancy rate and survival rate. Since death losses were small in this
trial, the data on weaning rate (Table 4) closely paralleled those of pregnancy. The one exception of
this trend pertained to breed of sire effects, which were highly significant for pregnancy but
approximately nil for wean rate. This resulted from breed of sire effects being reversed for pregnancy
and survival rates.
The average weaning rate for the trial was 71%. The average for the three pasture programs was
63%, 73%, and 76%, respectively. The average weaning rates by breed of cow were: 69% for the B;
76% for the B3S1; 74% for the F1; 75% for the S3B1; and 60% for the S.
As was the cause for pregnancy rate, the cow groups responded differently to the pasture programs
for weaning rates. A good portion of the interaction effects resulted from the crossbred cows
responding more to improved conditions than did the purebreds. The average weaning rates for the
three groups of crossbred cows were similar, varying from 74% for the F1
to 76% for the B3S1 cows.
| Table 4. Average Rates for Pregnancy, Calf Survival, and Weaning Classified by Breed of Cow X Pasture Program and Breed of Sire X Program. | ||||||||||||
| Pregnancy Rate % Program |
Survival Rate % Program |
Weaning Rate % Program | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | |
| Breed of dam | ||||||||||||
| B | 61 | 77 | 75 | 71 | 96 | 97 | 96 | 97 | 59 | 75 | 72 | 69 |
| B3 | 69 | 85 | 83 | 80 | 96 | 97 | 96 | 95 | 66 | 84 | 77 | 76 |
| F1 | 61 | 83 | 85 | 76 | 96 | 97 | 96 | 96 | 59 | 81 | 82 | 74 |
| B1 | 71 | 68 | 87 | 75 | 99 | 100 | 97 | 98 | 71 | 68 | 84 | 75 |
| S | 61 | 62 | 69 | 64 | 95 | 94 | 93 | 94 | 58 | 58 | 64 | 60 |
| Breed of sire | ||||||||||||
| B | 67 | 77 | 85 | 76 | 94 | 96 | 93 | 94 | 63 | 73 | 79 | 72 |
| S | 62 | 77 | 78 | 72 | 99 | 98 | 97 | 98 | 62 | 76 | 76 | 71 |
Where mating occurs in a restricted season and calves are weaned all at one time, age at weaning is
an important production trait, influencing the weight and value of calf produced. It was analyzed as
a production trait in this study in addition to using it for estimating weights at a constant age of 205
days.
Pasture program and breed composition of dam significantly (P<.01) influenced age of calf. Age
of calf varied from 218 days for Program 1 to 226 days for Program 3 (Table 5). This trend reflected
the possibility of a shorter calving interval from calving to estrus in the improved program (8,9). Age
of calf varied from 214 days for the pure Brahman to 229 days for the F1 calves out of Shorthorn
cows (P<.01). A long gestation period for Brahman cows along with a difference in interval to first
postpartum estrus likely entered into this difference (2,9,11,12). These results also suggest that the
Shorthorn cows which did conceive, did so early in the breeding season.
Condition Score -
This trait was included because it reflects thrift and vitality and generally is positively associated with
prices received for calves. The calves were scored to the nearest one-third of a Federal market grade
for slaughtered calves. Scores of 6, 7, and 8 were used to designate low, medium, and high
commercial, 9 to 11 for good, 12 to 14 choice, etc.
As seen in Table 5, condition score was significantly influenced by pasture program (P), breed of dam
(D), breed of sire (S), and P x D interaction effects. Progeny of Brahman dams improved by one-third
of a grade in condition from Program 1 to Program 3, progeny of crossbred dams improved
two-thirds of a grade, and the progeny of Shorthorn females increased by four-thirds of a grade in
the improved program.
Significant heterosis in the crossbreds was obvious for condition score with estimates of 9% for F1
calves in purebred dams, 14% for backcross calves on F1 dams, 8% for B5
S3 or S5B3 calves on
backcross cows, and 5% for S7B1 and B7S1 calves on
backcross dams. Heterosis levels tended to be
higher in the native pasture program than on improved pastures for condition score.
Wean Weight and 205-day weight -
Estimated 205-day weight is a measure of growth rate, while weaning weight reflects differences in
both rate of growth and age at weaning. In this study, the trends shown for pasture program and
breed group differences were similar for the two traits (Table 5). Due to this similarity, the two traits
will be discussed in conjunction.
Significant main effects (P<.01) were found for pasture program, breed of dam, and breed of sire.
Interaction effects for pasture program x breed classifications likewise were significant.
Average weaning weight was 416 pounds, varying from 357 pounds on the native to 461 pounds on
improved pasture (Table 6). Brahman-sired calves exceeded those sired by Shorthorn bulls by an
average of 15 pounds. Weaning weights by breed of dam across all pasture programs by ascending
order were 363, 409, 414, 432, and 463 pounds for the S, B1S3, B,
B3S1 and F1 cows, respectively.
Weaning weight of calves from the F1 cows averaged 100 pounds greater than that of the Shorthorn
and 49 pounds more than that of the Brahman, indicating a high degree of heterosis. Average weaning
weights across all pasture programs, relative to breed of calf, were highest for the product of the F1
cow when sired by Brahman bulls, at 475 pounds, and lowest for purebred Shorthorn calves, at 321
pounds. Weaning weights dropped when either Shorthorn or Brahman breeding in the calf exceeded
three-fourths. The backcross calves, B5S3 and B3S5
out of B1S3 and B3S1 dams, were second only to
the products of the F1 cows.
Breeding Brahman instead of Shorthorn bulls to Shorthorn cows increased weaning weights 84
pounds, and breeding Shorthorn instead of Brahman bulls to Brahman cows increased weaning
weights 63 pounds. Improvements in weaning weights were also obtained when Brahman bulls
instead of Shorthorn were bred to B1S3 cows (55 pounds) and Shorthorn instead of Brahman bulls
to B3S1 cows (24 pounds).
Highly significant interaction of breed of calf with pasture program was observed (Table 6). This was
due to a differential response of calves; the Brahman increased only 32 pounds with improvement in
pastures, whereas the Shorthorn calves increased 136 pounds. Backcross calves, B3S1
and S3B1,
responded similarly with increases of 119 and 118 pounds for the two breed groups, respectively.
Interaction of breed of dam with pasture program was highly significant, with the response to
improved pastures increasing as the proportion of Shorthorn breeding in the cow increased. An
interesting feature was that the Brahman female produced as well on the intermediate program as she
did on highly improved pastures.
Heterosis levels for calf weights were high. The advantage for crossbreds in weaning weights varied
from 14% for B7S1 and S7B1 calves nursing 3/4 - 1/4 cows to
32% for the reciprocal backcross calves
on F1 dams (Table 6). Average heterosis levels for 205-day weight were slightly lower on the highly
improved native (20%) than on native range (25%) but approximately equal (24% vs 25%) for the
two programs for weaning weight.
| Table 5. Breed X Program Least Squares Means for Age at Weaning, Condition Score, and 205-day Weight for Breed of Calf, Breed of Sire, Breed of Dam, and Crossbred Advantage for Different Traits. | ||||||||||||
| Weaning Age Program |
Condition Score Program |
205-day Weight Program | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | |
| - days - | - score - | - lbs - | ||||||||||
| Breed of Calf | ||||||||||||
| B x B | 215 | 222 | 206 | 214 | 7.9 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 342 | 381 | 394 | 372 |
| B x B3 | 219 | 223 | 219 | 220 | 7.9 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 9.1 | 356 | 409 | 430 | 398 |
| B x F1 | 221 | 225 | 225 | 224 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 10.8 | 9.7 | 387 | 453 | 488 | 442 |
| B x B1 | 219 | 214 | 222 | 218 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 10.3 | 9.1 | 359 | 418 | 465 | 414 |
| B x S | 223 | 227 | 238 | 229 | 7.2 | 9.2 | 10.7 | 9.0 | 307 | 381 | 411 | 366 |
| S x B | 204 | 219 | 234 | 219 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 10.4 | 9.8 | 382 | 444 | 441 | 422 |
| S x B3 | 220 | 225 | 233 | 226 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 379 | 418 | 433 | 410 |
| S x F1 | 215 | 227 | 235 | 226 | 8.8 | 10.2 | 11.2 | 10.1 | 372 | 435 | 447 | 417 |
| S x B1 | 217 | 218 | 212 | 216 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 10.3 | 9.1 | 318 | 380 | 404 | 367 |
| S x S | 224 | 225 | 223 | 224 | 6.2 | 9.0 | 10.9 | 8.7 | 230 | 320 | 356 | 302 |
| Breed of sire | ||||||||||||
| B | 219 | 222 | 222 | 221 | 7.9 | 9.3 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 350 | 408 | 438 | 398 |
| S | 216 | 223 | 227 | 222 | 8.1 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 9.5 | 336 | 399 | 416 | 384 |
| Breed of Dam | ||||||||||||
| B | 209 | 220 | 220 | 217 | 8.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 9.2 | 362 | 413 | 417 | 397 |
| B3 | 219 | 224 | 226 | 223 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 367 | 413 | 431 | 404 |
| F1 | 218 | 226 | 230 | 225 | 8.6 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 9.9 | 380 | 443 | 467 | 430 |
| B1 | 218 | 216 | 217 | 217 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 10.3 | 9.1 | 338 | 399 | 434 | 391 |
| S | 223 | 226 | 230 | 227 | 6.9 | 9.1 | 10.8 | 8.9 | 269 | 350 | 383 | 334 |
| All groups | 218 | 223 | 225 | 222 | 8.0 | 9.4 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 343 | 404 | 426 | 391 |
| Advantage of crossbreds over purebreds % | ||||||||||||
| Calf Dam | ||||||||||||
| F1 PB | -3 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 15 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 14 | 17 |
| 3/4 F1 | -1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 33 | 26 | 25 | 27 |
| 3/8 3/4 | 0 | -2 | 6 | +1 | 21 | -1 | 8 | 8 | 29 | 20 | 20 | 22 |
| 7/8 3/4 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 13 | 11 | 13 |
This trait is a measure of total herd performance to weaning. It includes weaning rate times weaning
weight. The average production per cow was 298 pounds, with values for pasture programs varying
from a low of 224 pounds for the native range to 351 pounds for the highly improved pastures (Table
6). Breed groups ranged from 196 pounds for the pure Shorthorn to a high of 366 pounds for S5B3
calves on cows. Utilizing both breeds of sires, the F1 cow produced 348 pounds compared to 329
pounds for the B3Sl cows and 306 pounds for the S3B1
cows. Total production for Brahman and B3S1
cows on the intermediate pasture program exceeded that on highly improved pasture.
The differential response of breed groups to the three pasture programs followed the same pattern
as that for calf weights. The response to improved pasture was greater for cows with a predominance
of Shorthorn breeding than for dams predominately of Brahman breeding.
Heterosis levels observed for annual production per cow were high. The level of heterosis for the
reciprocal 3/8 - 5/8 calves nursing 3/4 blood cows on improved pasture was 63%. The advantage of
the F1 cows over the average of the purebred increased linearly with improvements in pasture
program, 37% for the native range, 48% for the intermediate program, and 58% for the improved
program. Responses of this magnitude emphasize the utility of the Brahman and European crosses
for improvement of production performance in environments where the improved temperate-zone
breeds are not well adapted. They suggested also that Zebu-European crosses may have utility under
other conditions.
In these data, calf growth was positively associated with Brahman breeding, suggesting that the
additive effects of the Brahman for adaptability to this area contributed to growth of calf.
The data for breed groups probably can best be interpreted in terms of: (1) additive genetic merit of
the parent breeds involved, (2) climatic adaptability of the various breed groups, and (3) level of
hybrid vigor influencing performance.
| Table 6. Breed X Program Least Squares Means for Weaning Weight, Weaning Rate, and Production Per Cow for Breed of Calf, Breed of Sire, Breed of Dam, and Crossbred Advantage for Different Traits. | ||||||||||||
| Weaning Weight Program |
Weaning Rate Program |
Production Per Cow Program | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | 1 | 2 | 3 | Av. | |
| - lbs - | - % - | - lbs - | ||||||||||
| Breed of Calf | ||||||||||||
| B x B | 350 | 404 | 392 | 382 | 56 | 76 | 79 | 70 | 196 | 307 | 310 | 271 |
| B x B3 | 372 | 435 | 453 | 420 | 65 | 75 | 70 | 70 | 242 | 326 | 317 | 295 |
| B x F1 | 408 | 489 | 527 | 475 | 63 | 83 | 81 | 76 | 257 | 406 | 427 | 363 |
| B x B1 | 379 | 432 | 497 | 436 | 71 | 71 | 93 | 78 | 269 | 307 | 462 | 346 |
| B x S | 332 | 416 | 467 | 405 | 57 | 52 | 71 | 60 | 189 | 216 | 332 | 245 |
| S x B | 377 | 466 | 493 | 445 | 63 | 74 | 65 | 68 | 238 | 345 | 320 | 301 |
| S x B3 | 400 | 451 | 482 | 444 | 68 | 92 | 85 | 82 | 272 | 415 | 410 | 366 |
| S x F1 | 383 | 473 | 501 | 452 | 54 | 79 | 84 | 72 | 207 | 374 | 421 | 334 |
| S x B1 | 328 | 400 | 416 | 381 | 71 | 65 | 75 | 71 | 233 | 260 | 312 | 268 |
| S x S | 244 | 338 | 380 | 321 | 59 | 65 | 69 | 61 | 144 | 220 | 224 | 196 |
| Breed of sire | ||||||||||||
| B | 368 | 435 | 467 | 424 | 62 | 71 | 79 | 71 | 231 | 312 | 370 | 304 |
| S | 346 | 426 | 454 | 409 | 63 | 75 | 74 | 71 | 219 | 323 | 337 | 293 |
| Breed of Dam | ||||||||||||
| B | 363 | 435 | 442 | 414 | 59 | 75 | 72 | 69 | 214 | 326 | 318 | 286 |
| B3 | 386 | 443 | 467 | 432 | 66 | 84 | 77 | 76 | 255 | 372 | 360 | 329 |
| F1 | 396 | 481 | 514 | 463 | 59 | 81 | 82 | 74 | 234 | 390 | 421 | 348 |
| B1 | 354 | 416 | 457 | 409 | 71 | 68 | 84 | 75 | 252 | 283 | 384 | 306 |
| S | 288 | 377 | 423 | 363 | 58 | 58 | 64 | 60 | 167 | 219 | 271 | 219 |
| All groups | 357 | 430 | 461 | 416 | 63 | 73 | 76 | 71 | 224 | 318 | 351 | 298 |
| Advantage of crossbreds over purebreds % | ||||||||||||
| Calf Dam | ||||||||||||
| F1 PB | 19 | 19 | 25 | 21 | 4 | -11 | -1 | -2 | 26 | 6 | 22 | 17 |
| 3/4 F1 | 33 | 30 | 33 | 32 | 2 | 15 | 20 | 13 | 37 | 48 | 58 | 50 |
| 3/8 3/4 | 31 | 19 | 27 | 25 | 21 | 16 | 29 | 22 | 59 | 37 | 63 | 52 |
| 7/8 3/4 | 18 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 18 | -1 | 5 | 8 | 40 | 11 | 18 | 21 |
Five breed groups of dams including Brahman (B), Shorthorn (S), 3/4 B-1/4 S (B3S1),1/2 B-l/2 S (F1)
and 3/4 S-1/4 B (S3B1), each mated to both Brahman and Shorthorn sires, grazed continuously on
three different pasture programs. The pastures were native (P1) a combination of native and improved
pasture (P2,), and all improved pastures including irrigated clover-grass area (P3).
Highly significant differences (P<.01 occurred in pregnancy rate and weaning rate for both breed of
cow and pasture program. Pregnancy rates for Brahman sires were higher (P<.05) than for Shorthorn
sires, but a higher survival rate (P<.01 of Shorthorn sired calves made weaning rate for sires
non-significant. Average weaning rates by breed of dam were 69% 76%, 74%, 75%, and 60% for B,
B3, F1, B1 and S cows, respectively. Weaning rates for pasture programs were 63 63% 73% and 76%
for P1, P2, and P3 programs, respectively.
Weaning age, condition score, 205-day weight, weaning weight, and production per cow
variations were highly significant (P<.01) for pasture program, breed of dam, and breed of calf.
Breed of sire effects resulted in higher condition scores for Shorthorn sired calves and heavier
205-day and weaning weights for Brahman sired calves. Breed of sire effects were non-significant
for age at weaning and production per cow. However, mating system was highly significant
(P<.01) for production per cow. Breed classifications for both calf and dam showed significant
(P<.01) first order interactions for all traits except for breed of dam x pasture programs for
weaning age.
Crossing the purebred Shorthorn and Brahman resulted in increased weaning weights of 26% for
calves of the Shorthorn dams and 16% for the Brahman dams. Weaning weight of calves from F1
cows exceeded the average of the purebred progeny by 35% when sired by Brahman bulls and 29 %
when sired by Shorthorn bulls. The advantage of all crossbreds over the average of the purebreds was
1.5%, 9.1%, 19.8%, 22.9%, 10.1%, and 34.8%, respectively, for age at weaning, condition score,
205-day weight, weaning weight, weaning rate, and annual production per cow.
Significant interactions for breed of cow x pasture program was the result of F1 cows responding
more to improvements in nutrition than the purebred groups. These F1 cows responded linearly in all
traits with each increment of improvement in pasture programs. Brahman breeding appeared to be
associated with growth, while Shorthorn breeding appeared to be related to degree of condition
relative to pasture program.